What do you sit on, but don't take with you?

First, I don't know why I'm surprised, but are you aware that there is a world's trade fair entirely dedicated to office furniture (among other things)? NeoCon 2006!

Second, are you aware they give out Gold & Silver medals for "continuous fixed seating systems" (among other things I presume)? They do. (Good thing that site requires registration... that's got to be some high quality information information about facilities management. You can use my login and password to get in if you'd like: username: "whatseriously", password: "what")

Here's a picture of the award winning continous fixed seating system!

Those people at SediaSystems are geniuses. GENIUSES.

However, let's get to the issue at hand. Chairs. According to this article that's been sitting around on my desk for no less than 3 years, the award winner for 2002 for office chairs is Knoll, with this little bad boy.

Ok, I'm not going to lie to you, it looks pretty good. But somehow, I still don't think it's going to provide the 8 to 10 hours of hard core sitting comfort I'm looking for. You know what I really want? One of those sensory deprivation chambers, but for work. I could just lie there, floating, my head back and legs perfectly supported as I typed away at blazing speed. I wouldn't even have to hold myself up as the viscosity of the liquid would be thick enough that it would allow all my muscles to relax simultaneously. Now THAT'S what I'm talking about. Like that episode where Homer is hovering in the wind tunnel? Ah good times.

What a Human Life is Worth

While I'm sitting here pouring through government data, a really cool article has been sitting on my desk for a while.

"The Human Factor" from the NYTimes Magazine, 2004-03-28

Unfortunately, one of the best parts of the article is only in the print version. Observe:

Pay to Breathe

How much Americans will spend to avoid one day of each symptom, as estimated for the E. P. A. (in 1990 dollars)

Coughing  ................................. $4.98
Chesh Tightness  .......................... $6.29
Head congestion/sinus  .................... $8.20
Shortness of breath  ..................... $10.57
Allergy (chronic) ........................ $15.72
Eye irritation ........................... $15.72
Throat Congestion ........................ $16.35
Drowsiness ............................... $18.87
Nausea ................................... $22.01
Headache ................................. $25.16
Asthma attack ............................ $32.48
Bronchitis & Emphysema (chronic) ................................ $84.28

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmm! Datalicious!

The really cool part about this is you can now guestimate whether or not it's better to fix something or just pay off everyone who would be affected. Nuclear fallout? Average person in a population of 100,000 affected within 200 miles would pay $700,000 in medical bills. But the cost to clean up would be 10 trillion. Pay them off!

Ok, so that's a bit much. But really, it does make enormous sense. It also guides us what to spend our top research dollars on, based on the population and how these diseases are spread out. Do you think the "drowsiness" costs include coffee?

Time is Money, People!

This is an incredibly depressing article:

Could rising gas prices kill the suburbs?

Not, of course, because the suburbs should not die. In fact, the suburbs should die. They are wasteful and annoying. I think you should have three choices of where to live.

  1. A) Rural - really rural
  2. B) City - really city
  3. C) Suburbs where you pay a hefty tax for using up all the resources in such an inefficient way that it hurts A and B above.

However, the reason I'm so depressed about it is because the article questions whether or not rising gas prices are going to end the suburbs. Give me a break! The average person spends about 33% more on gas today than they did a few years ago. Assuming a 15 gallon tank gets filled up 3 times a month, his adds up to around $50 a month more. And this is the reason to leave the suburbs? How about the fact that you're stuck in traffic every day for 10 minutes more each way than if you live that much closer. Even if you have a low paying job of $10/hour, that means you're giving up $50 a month. If you make $50k/year (about $25/hour), you're giving up about $150! And that's being extra generous... according to this, the average commute is 139 hours. Good God!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5245860.stm

Fine, so these savings don't show up in your bank account. I don't know about you, but 10 minutes extra of sleep or watching TV or reading or ANYTHING would be better than sitting in traffic. I guess it just surprises me that people are willing to go so far for a couple of hard dollars when your time is the real casualty in all this.

S.U.V. as a Manifestation of Learned Helplessness

An OLD article in the New Yorker (you're going to be seeing a lot of these from me as I clean out my queue) covered some of the odd elements around owning an S.U.V. and had a great tie into another area of my passion... psychology.

I'm not sure if you know about the concept of Learned Helplessness but Wikipedia sums it up pretty nicely:

Learned helplessness [...] is a description of the effect of inescapable punishment (such as electrical shock) on animal behaviour. Learned helplessness may also occur in everyday situations where continued failure may inhibit somebody from experiencing agency in the future, leading to many forms of depression.

The interesting part here is that we, Americans mostly but I'm sure it is to some degree a world wide phenomenon, are both the cause of and victim of our own types of Learned Helplessness behavior.

Recently, everyone has been so concerned with terrorism, but the likelihood of getting hit by a terrorist attack is so much lower than a plane crash, which is already ridiculously low. But that's not how humans work. We don't do the math and then realize that there's no chance we'll need 15 rooms in our house for the once in a lifetime occurance when everyone in our family comes to town spontaneously and there's a plumbers convention causing every hotel and motel to be filled. Instead, we go out and buy the biggest house we can find and sit around listening to ourselves make echos (or fill up the 3rd through 10th bedrooms as "storage").

Same thing happens with danger. So we want to take action to prevent harm instead of sitting back and waiting for harm to come to us. But the fact is that harm will come to us whether we like it or not, so don't bother wasting time/money energy on it. And now we get to the quote:

We live in an age, after all, that is strangely fixated on the idea of helplessness: we're fascinated by hurricanes and terrorist acts and epidemics like SARS--situations in which we feel powerless to affect our own destiny. In fact, the risks posed to life and limb fby forces outside our control are dwarfed by the factors we can control. Our fixation with helplessness distorts our perceptions of risk. "When you feel safe, you can be passive," Rapaille says of the fundamental appreal of the S.U.V. "Safe means I can sleep. I can give up control. I can relax. I can take off my shoes. I can listen to music."

Yet nothing could be further from the truth. We trade in perceived safety for ACTUAL danger (the average number of fatalities per passanger mile in an S.U.V. far outpace something small and seemingly unsafe like a Honda Civic). Ack.

New "Windows Live Writer"

This is now my second post from "Windows Live Writer" and I like it. A LOT. Super simple, it did auto detection that I post through blogger and tracks a bunch of different elements including styles and recent posts.

The only thing I'm not ecstatic about is the fact that every time I do a new post, it has to open up a new window. I'd much prefer having all the windows in one tabbed interface, or just closing the existing window (once posted) and reuse. Also, rather than firing up the browser page externally, you could have it in the same tabbed interface. All in all though, nice work Windows team!

Note to Self: Ready Lunar Park

Bret Easton Ellis has a new book out (and by new, I mean new to me, since it's been out since last August). I quite liked American Psycho though it was beyond insane, and this piggy backs on that. Apparently the character in the book "Bret Easton Ellis" is tracked by the character in American Psycho Patrick Bateman. Kind of stolen a little from Steven King, but I still want to read it.